Saw this upcoming SCEA event on exit strategy ..and recognized the same problem I've run into promoting my own talks on this topic -
#1 business owners don't see the need for exit strategy planning (ESP) until it's too late. It's probably a bit like the first folks being sold insurance ("you want me to pay money for what?")
Luckily, the companies that are playing in the Major Leagues - the M&A level - are usually playing with VC funds. And these are not folks who leave such things to chance.
The problem is that many of the small to mid-size businesses, aka the lower Middle Market, do not have advisors who understand the need, much less the experience to make sure that an exit strategy is developed that benefits the owner.
Left to their own devices, the owners keep plugging along, working hard to make customer / clients happy, to make sure employees are motivated, and so on. Meanwhile, time is passing by, and the clock should've started for such following examples:
- Implementing the new more tax-favorable entity structure
- Adopting the new accounting method to better reflect their cash flow
- Signing the buyout agreement to ensure a smooth transition when one of the partners unexpectedly leaves
- Bringing aboard the new marketing VP to round out the team
The list goes on..
Part of the problem is that many issues can be involved. But the simple basic reason is that "if you fail to plan, plan to fail!" While these captains of industry are at ease manning the helm of their business strategy or the latest market campaign, perhaps the problem is that exit strategy planning deals with more finances of a personal nature. And to some degree this remains perhaps the last taboo topic.
Most of us are comfortable now talking about everything and anything from health to marriage to even sex issues. But ask a person about their personal finances.. you may as well ask them strip down in public!
While doctors and lawyers work in fields where client confidentiality is a highly-guarded mainstay, maybe the problem is that having this spelled out in a similar fashion is something missing in the business advisor / financial field.
In fact, it is a specific exception - "When an attorney is not acting primarily as an attorney but, for instance, as a business advisor, member of the Board of Directors, or in another non-legal role, then the privilege generally does not apply"
So, basically, we have an unholy trilogy - perceived cost / complexity / no sense of urgency. No wonder why most small to mid-sized businesses flame out or get inherited as a sorry state of affairs!